AG's 'spinning' is just embarrassing
Sometimes the practice of law must be
like wearing a hospital gown--pirouettes can expose your bum.
Case in point: Attorney General Talis
Colberg "spinning" different reasons for tearing
up his written pledge to let state employees cooperate with
the legislature's investigation of the Walt Monegan affair.
His explanatory letters to the legislative council simply
amount to inartful pirouettes that flash his bum rationalizations.
Colberg rationalization #1 for breaking
his written pledge: "new circumstances intervened--supporting
the governor's decision to cooperate only with the Personnel
Board investigation." Actually, those circumstances were
quite old, not new. Eight days before the AG made his written
offer to the legislature and 11 days before the legislature
accepted in writing, the governor made it clear she believed
the board was the only legal entity for the investigation.
She said so in the complaint she filed against herself (then
tried to dismiss) with the board. The AG can't use "new
circumstances" as an excuse when the circumstances predate
by more than a week his written offer and the legislature's
written acceptance. Rationalization #1, if used as a hospital
gown, doesn't begin to cover the AG's bum.
Colberg rationalization #2 for breaking
his written pledge: "our clients (the state employees)
have taken an oath to uphold the Alaska Constitution and for
that reason they respect the legislature's desire to carry
out an investigation in support of its law-making powers.
However, our clients are also loyal employees subject to the
supervision of the governor." Arguing that state employees
now have loyalty issues, suggests at-will employees of the
governor can elevate loyalty to the level of our constitution
and laws. In this case, 'open and transparent' apparently
means the AG flashes his bum without even trying to tie his
legalistic hospital gown together in back.
Colberg rationalization #3 for breaking
his written pledge: the subpoenas place state employees "in
the difficult position of either choosing to support the governor's
decision to cooperate only with the Personnel Board or to
voluntarily comply with the subpoenas." Who decided responding
to subpoenas is "voluntary"and why would the AG,
who himself uses subpoenas to compel needed information, even
want to suggest they are "voluntary"? I'd note the
Superior Court ruled several days ago the AG was flat wrong
and the state employees must respond to legislative subpoenas.
Here, the court stripped the AG's hospital gown off and revealed
his (legal) briefs are as lacking in substance and support
as men's bikini briefs.
Time for a short summary. The AG made
a written agreement and then broke it. He went to the court
to quash subpoenas and got slam dunked. Less than honorable,
no legal foundation.
When the AG's honor is questionable,
it chills his ability to reach complex written agreements
with others negotiating civil or criminal issues with the
Department of Law. Why deal with an AG who so cavalierly breaks
a written deal with the legislature?
And, if the AG doesn't understand the
law that governs subpoenas, what else doesn't he understand?
Can he do a job that requires far more complex legal analysis
in other matters of law?
Perhaps it's time that Mr. Colberg at
least let his staff tie up the back of his hospital gown.
Failing that he should discharge himself and replace the gown
with civvies.
Capitol Undercurrents
Thing #1 we learned about
Alaska from the WaPo-- The Washington Post reported
last week that an outside public relations firm was hired by
the state helped elevate the visibility of Guv Palin on the
national level--a Massachusetts PR person recommended by the
law firm that used to employ convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
The $31,000 contract was let through the Department of Natural
Resources.
Thing #2 we learned about
Alaska from the WaPo-- The $17,000 plus in per diem
collected by the guv while staying at her home in Wasilla for
312 days.
Check with mom or dad--
Friend and constituent Harvey Marvin shared a note from his
doctor’s office. It read: "Dear Parent or Guardian:
your child, Harvey, is due for immunizations." It went
on to say he was due for a flu shot. Harvey is 75 years old.
Red light, green light--
A September 26 email to all the commissioners from the Attorney
General requires each state department to release public records
only after the Department of Law has reviewed the request and
the public documents. Given the AG’s record so far (see
the adjacent column) I’m not sure I’m comfortable
with his ability to impartially determine the laws on public
records. If he now is the "open and transparent" traffic
cop, I hope he: green lights the proper flow of public records
in a very timely manner; understands the public records law
better than the law on subpoenas; and doesn’t let loyalty
be elevated to a position equal with the law.
Note from a friend--
Speaking of the AG’s grasp on the law regarding subpoenas,
an attorney friend sent me a note reading: "I want to know
if I should change the language in our subpoena template from
‘you are commanded to appear’ to ‘it would
be really nice if you could drop by at your convenience.’"
Is Alaska really insulated?--
The global economic shock waves have implications we’ve
yet to discuss in Alaska. Credit markets as tight as a Donald
Trump’s pre-nup can’t help but affect dollars for
an Alaska gas pipeline--especially since the AGIA recipe limits
the amount of equity participation and mandates a certain level
of debt financing. The price of a barrel of oil now hovers at
that point where it may not sustain our present level of spending
on the state budget. State retirement accounts are bleeding.
What if?-- The toxic debate about Sen. Obama’s
character and name has potential blowback for Alaska. What happens
to the governor’s ability to work with a new administration
if Sen. Obama becomes President Obama? The "palling around
with terrorists" and other one-liners delivered at her
rallies will, hopefully, be forgotten as Alaska tries to work
with the administration on getting a gas pipeline, or fisheries
issues, or oil and mining issues, or . . .
|